yattongas
Forum Legend
Posts: 15,503 
Member is Online
|
Post by yattongas on Mar 3, 2023 15:04:18 GMT
So what proof do you actually have of Starmer having a social? There’s a dodgy photo through a window that has been proven to be taken during the time he was doing some sort of webcast. Boris has photos, screenshots & videos of toasting, drinking alcohol & hosting Christmas parties - and you think he only had a cuppa? You know exactly what is meant by that last sentence. Let me guess, do you presume to believe that Starmer refused to prosecute Jimmy Saville? He certainly looked hard at work doing a "webcast" whilst drinking a bottle of beer and eating a curry. Didn't he also at the same time pose holding up a non league football Jersey having taken time out to discuss the non league club who interrupted his...."webcast" In respect of your last sentence it was under his watch that Saville wasn't prosecuted along with not prosecuting the police officer who killed Ian Tomlinson and taking the decision not to prosecute anyone over the killing of Jean Charles de Menezes so yes I blame him in the same way people have blamed boris on various things because it was under his watch. Your mob knighted Saville . You are a plonker sometimes France 🙄 |
|
|
|
Post by stuart1974 on Mar 3, 2023 15:36:37 GMT
Saville: In 2007 and 2008, Surrey Police had investigated four complaints that Savile had sexually assaulted young girls and he was interviewed under caution. However, no arrest was made nor prosecution brought as the victims were not prepared to support police action. “The suggestion of a link between the handling of the cases and Starmer is baseless,” said Reuters. While he was head of the CPS, he was not the reviewing lawyer for the case and later commissioned a review into the decision. Jean Charles de Menezes: A separate decision not to prosecute anyone over the death of in 2005 of Jean Charles de Menezes, shot by police who mistook him for a suicide bomber, was also met with anger. The victim’s family took the case all the way to the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg, but the decision was upheld. Ian Tomlinson: The CPS initially decided not to charge Harwood after a pathologist found that Tomlinson had died of natural causes, but changed its mind after an inquest gave the verdict of unlawful killing two years later. Harwood was subsequently acquitted of manslaughter but dismissed from the police force for gross misconduct. www.google.com/amp/s/www.theweek.co.uk/news/politics/955638/what-did-keir-starmer-do-as-dpp%3famp |
|
|
|
Post by francegas on Mar 3, 2023 15:42:18 GMT
He certainly looked hard at work doing a "webcast" whilst drinking a bottle of beer and eating a curry. Didn't he also at the same time pose holding up a non league football Jersey having taken time out to discuss the non league club who interrupted his...."webcast" In respect of your last sentence it was under his watch that Saville wasn't prosecuted along with not prosecuting the police officer who killed Ian Tomlinson and taking the decision not to prosecute anyone over the killing of Jean Charles de Menezes so yes I blame him in the same way people have blamed boris on various things because it was under his watch. Your mob knighted Saville . You are a plonker sometimes France 🙄 Wasn't Saville knighted in 1990 some 20+ years before it emerged he had abused 100s of people throughout his life. Talk about hindsight 🙄 If your saying the Tories should have known then so should have Labour and they should have stripped him of his knighthood. |
|
yattongas
Forum Legend
Posts: 15,503
Member is Online
|
Post by yattongas on Mar 3, 2023 15:51:45 GMT
Your mob knighted Saville . You are a plonker sometimes France 🙄 Wasn't Saville knighted in 1990 some 20+ years before it emerged he had abused 100s of people throughout his life. Talk about hindsight 🙄 If you’re saying the Tories should have known then so should have Labour and they should have stripped him of his knighthood. He was known as wrong’un for years . Always gave me the creeps when he was on Jim’ll fix it with his dodgy tracksuit , awful dyed hair and that cigar . His seat was cool though , always wanted one of those as a kid ! Is there any political circumstance in which you wouldn’t blindly fly the Tory flag ? I’ll happily call out Labour for their ridiculous stance on Brexit and them claiming they can make a dogs dinner palatable. |
|
|
|
Post by oldie on Mar 3, 2023 16:00:27 GMT
Wasn't Saville knighted in 1990 some 20+ years before it emerged he had abused 100s of people throughout his life. Talk about hindsight 🙄 If you’re saying the Tories should have known then so should have Labour and they should have stripped him of his knighthood. He was known as wrong’un for years . Always gave me the creeps when he was on Jim’ll fix it with his dodgy tracksuit , awful dyed hair and that cigar . His seat was cool though , always wanted one of those as a kid ! Is there any political circumstance in which you wouldn’t blindly fly the Tory flag ? I’ll happily call out Labour for their ridiculous stance on Brexit and them claiming they can make a dogs dinner palatable. "I’ll happily call out Labour for their ridiculous stance on Brexit and them claiming they can make a dogs dinner palatable. " Join the club. The idiot Corbyn who sat on the fence for so long probably cost the remain vote that referendum. |
|
yattongas
Forum Legend
Posts: 15,503
Member is Online
|
Post by yattongas on Mar 4, 2023 6:25:48 GMT
This is the channel that France watches 😂
|
|
|
|
Post by gulfofaden on Mar 6, 2023 19:23:54 GMT
This is the channel that France watches 😂 Milfythegamer. Solid |
|
|
|
Post by oldie on Mar 6, 2023 22:20:27 GMT
This is the channel that France watches 😂 Milfythegamer. Solid Not the messenger, the message. |
|
|
|
Post by stuart1974 on Mar 7, 2023 14:04:01 GMT
The Home Secretary has just stood up in the Commons, proposals are:
• It will be possible to detain people for 28 days without bail or judicial review
• The onus to remove those who enter illegally will be on the home secretary - to "radically" narrow the number of challenges and appeals
• Only those under 18, those medically unfit to fly or at "real risk" if they are returned to the country they have left will be able to lodge an appeal to stop them from being deported
• Any other claims will be heard remotely after they have been removed
• People will be prevented from using modern slavery laws to oppose the government
• An annual cap on the number of people entering via safe routes - to be set by parliament - will "ensure an orderly system"
• A lifetime ban on settlement, citizenship and re-entry to the UK for those removed under the scheme.
|
|
|
|
Post by peterparker on Mar 7, 2023 14:37:52 GMT
The Home Secretary has just stood up in the Commons, proposals are: • It will be possible to detain people for 28 days without bail or judicial review • The onus to remove those who enter illegally will be on the home secretary - to "radically" narrow the number of challenges and appeals • Only those under 18, those medically unfit to fly or at "real risk" if they are returned to the country they have left will be able to lodge an appeal to stop them from being deported • Any other claims will be heard remotely after they have been removed • People will be prevented from using modern slavery laws to oppose the government • An annual cap on the number of people entering via safe routes - to be set by parliament - will "ensure an orderly system" • A lifetime ban on settlement, citizenship and re-entry to the UK for those removed under the scheme. just checking, but what are these safe routes again? |
|
|
|
Post by stuart1974 on Mar 7, 2023 14:44:49 GMT
The Home Secretary has just stood up in the Commons, proposals are: • It will be possible to detain people for 28 days without bail or judicial review • The onus to remove those who enter illegally will be on the home secretary - to "radically" narrow the number of challenges and appeals • Only those under 18, those medically unfit to fly or at "real risk" if they are returned to the country they have left will be able to lodge an appeal to stop them from being deported • Any other claims will be heard remotely after they have been removed • People will be prevented from using modern slavery laws to oppose the government • An annual cap on the number of people entering via safe routes - to be set by parliament - will "ensure an orderly system" • A lifetime ban on settlement, citizenship and re-entry to the UK for those removed under the scheme. just checking, but what are these safe routes again? Brown envelopes sent to Conservative Head Office, or is that peerages?* * Yes, I do recall cash for questions/honours. Both main parties have a history. |
|
yattongas
Forum Legend
Posts: 15,503
Member is Online
|
Post by yattongas on Mar 7, 2023 14:47:38 GMT
The Home Secretary has just stood up in the Commons, proposals are: • It will be possible to detain people for 28 days without bail or judicial review • The onus to remove those who enter illegally will be on the home secretary - to "radically" narrow the number of challenges and appeals • Only those under 18, those medically unfit to fly or at "real risk" if they are returned to the country they have left will be able to lodge an appeal to stop them from being deported • Any other claims will be heard remotely after they have been removed • People will be prevented from using modern slavery laws to oppose the government • An annual cap on the number of people entering via safe routes - to be set by parliament - will "ensure an orderly system" • A lifetime ban on settlement, citizenship and re-entry to the UK for those removed under the scheme. Obvs it won’t work , obvs the British public will fall for this nonsense is big numbers , obvs it’ll be blamed on Labour and Lefties when it doesn’t work but most obvious of all is they don’t want to solve (their) problem as they would have nothing else to stand for , it’s their raison d’etre and one of the only reasons they get any votes. Mainly from those racist older folks ….again . sad innit ? 🙄🇬🇧 |
|
|
|
Post by stuart1974 on Mar 7, 2023 15:04:03 GMT
The Home Secretary has just stood up in the Commons, proposals are: • It will be possible to detain people for 28 days without bail or judicial review • The onus to remove those who enter illegally will be on the home secretary - to "radically" narrow the number of challenges and appeals • Only those under 18, those medically unfit to fly or at "real risk" if they are returned to the country they have left will be able to lodge an appeal to stop them from being deported • Any other claims will be heard remotely after they have been removed • People will be prevented from using modern slavery laws to oppose the government • An annual cap on the number of people entering via safe routes - to be set by parliament - will "ensure an orderly system" • A lifetime ban on settlement, citizenship and re-entry to the UK for those removed under the scheme. Obvs it won’t work , obvs the British public will fall for this nonsense is big numbers , obvs it’ll be blamed on Labour and Lefties when it doesn’t work but most obvious of all is they don’t want to solve (their) problem as they would have nothing else to stand for , it’s their raison d’etre and one of the only reasons they get any votes. Mainly from those racist older folks ….again . sad innit ? 🙄🇬🇧 Can't blame the EU anymore, the ECHR is the new scapegoat for their own failures. |
|
yattongas
Forum Legend
Posts: 15,503
Member is Online
|
Post by yattongas on Mar 7, 2023 15:09:03 GMT
Obvs it won’t work , obvs the British public will fall for this nonsense is big numbers , obvs it’ll be blamed on Labour and Lefties when it doesn’t work but most obvious of all is they don’t want to solve (their) problem as they would have nothing else to stand for , it’s their raison d’etre and one of the only reasons they get any votes. Mainly from those racist older folks ….again . sad innit ? 🙄🇬🇧 Can't blame the EU anymore, the ECHR is the new scapegoat for their own failures. Exactly, who would they have left to blame ? Although I’m sure they’ll soon come up with another scapegoat 🙄 |
|
|
|
Post by baggins on Mar 7, 2023 17:49:36 GMT
Can't blame the EU anymore, the ECHR is the new scapegoat for their own failures. Exactly, who would they have left to blame ? Although I’m sure they’ll soon come up with another scapegoat 🙄 Goats. Yes, you said it, blame the goats, pesky grass eating vegan yogurt pruducing b8stards. It's all their fault. |
|
|
|
Post by gulfofaden on Mar 7, 2023 18:20:55 GMT
Can't blame the EU anymore, the ECHR is the new scapegoat for their own failures. Exactly, who would they have left to blame ? Although I’m sure they’ll soon come up with another scapegoat 🙄 The party who rely on “those racist older folks” are always looking for “scapegoats” init. |
|
yattongas
Forum Legend
Posts: 15,503
Member is Online
|
Post by yattongas on Mar 7, 2023 18:28:20 GMT
Exactly, who would they have left to blame ? Although I’m sure they’ll soon come up with another scapegoat 🙄 The party who rely on “those racist older folks” are always looking for “scapegoats” init. They can still rely on the prat vote though 🙄 |
|
|
|
Post by gulfofaden on Mar 7, 2023 18:39:15 GMT
The party who rely on “those racist older folks” are always looking for “scapegoats” init. They can still rely on the prat vote though 🙄 Coming from the supporter of the deadbeat loser “give us yer cash tories” party that’s a bit rich. |
|
|
|
Post by peterparker on Mar 7, 2023 21:05:59 GMT
Rishi's lectern with the latest 3 word slogan
Stop The Boats.
Might as well say The National Front
This is what the Tories have been reduced to, the only thing they have to try and get re-elected. They have nothing.
|
|
|
|
Post by francegas on Mar 7, 2023 21:40:11 GMT
The Home Secretary has just stood up in the Commons, proposals are: • It will be possible to detain people for 28 days without bail or judicial review • The onus to remove those who enter illegally will be on the home secretary - to "radically" narrow the number of challenges and appeals • Only those under 18, those medically unfit to fly or at "real risk" if they are returned to the country they have left will be able to lodge an appeal to stop them from being deported • Any other claims will be heard remotely after they have been removed • People will be prevented from using modern slavery laws to oppose the government • An annual cap on the number of people entering via safe routes - to be set by parliament - will "ensure an orderly system" • A lifetime ban on settlement, citizenship and re-entry to the UK for those removed under the scheme. just checking, but what are these safe routes again? For the 11,000 Albanians who crossed the channel last year illegally, in small boats, I would have thought a €45 Easyjet flight from Tirana would be a safer route. (And a hell of a lot cheaper). |
|
