Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 10, 2015 20:35:05 GMT
I wonder if comments regarding the court case rovers v sainsburys should be suspended untill the outcome is known. I have seen this done on press releases etc. I am just a bit worried that if we get abusive or derogatory stuff on here it may harm our cause. Feel free anybody to tell me I am being paranoid.
|
|
|
|
Post by pirateman on Feb 10, 2015 20:49:48 GMT
Bristol Rovers fan - paranoid. After the last 14 years or so, makes sense
Not sure that what's written on a forum will affect anything though
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 10, 2015 20:59:29 GMT
I agree with the OP.
I feel quite strongly that the best way to support the club right now is to do and say nothing.
|
|
|
|
Post by Raj Gas on Feb 10, 2015 21:12:57 GMT
There are comments made regularly about how the Evil Post takes comments off our forums and for that reason we need to be careful when "people in the know" make comments.
|
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Feb 10, 2015 21:26:43 GMT
What precisely can fans say that lawyers dealing with a multi million pound case don't already know, particularly when posters know so little about the case?
All we need to do is make sure posters don't start abusing Sainsbury's Directors/lawyers etc
Next we'll have a thread suggesting we don't talk about Rovers in case Barnet etc use it to their own advantage in the final run in?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 10, 2015 21:42:04 GMT
All we need to do is make sure posters don't start abusing Sainsbury's Directors/lawyers etc That was the main thought behind the thread |
|
|
|
Post by empirebaypete on Feb 10, 2015 22:14:40 GMT
All we need to do is make sure posters don't start abusing Sainsbury's Directors/lawyers etc That was the main thought behind the thread or post allegations like Sainbury's have offered The Rovers millions already, without any source. |
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Feb 10, 2015 22:18:11 GMT
Well that's surely just forum nonsense rather than a threat to our legal case?
|
|
|
|
Post by empirebaypete on Feb 10, 2015 22:51:52 GMT
Well that's surely just forum nonsense rather than a threat to our legal case? What that Sainbury's have offered Rovers Millions? According to the poster NH said it after being asked by a reporter. Funnily enough the poster is the only one to know this. |
|
|
|
Post by Cantankerous Gas on Feb 10, 2015 23:26:52 GMT
All we need to do is make sure posters don't start abusing Sainsbury's Directors/lawyers etc That was the main thought behind the thread I heard the Sainsbury's CEO has got a tiny pecker. |
|
|
|
Post by empirebaypete on Feb 10, 2015 23:29:16 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by oldgas on Feb 11, 2015 15:38:18 GMT
I wonder if comments regarding the court case rovers v sainsburys should be suspended untill the outcome is known. I have seen this done on press releases etc. I am just a bit worried that if we get abusive or derogatory stuff on here it may harm our cause. Feel free anybody to tell me I am being paranoid. I don't think the ramblings on this forum wil have any bearing on the outcome of the court hearing. No one posting on here has any knowledge of the contractural situation between the parties and I doubt very much that anyone amongst the select few would be writing comments on here. All this forum provides is an opportunity for frustrated fans to discuss the situation as they see it, and there's nothing wrong with that I can't really see a situation where, in summing up, the Learned Judge says "I was minded to make a full award in favour of the Stadium Company with additional punitive damages against J. Sainsbury until I chanced to read through several threads on something called GAs Chat forum. Having digested some of the scurrilous, inaccurate and downright rude comments contained therein I find myself compelled to find in favour of said Sainsburys. in summary, I would say to the contributors on that forum........ "You're sh!t, and you know you are, You're sh!t, and you know you are".............. |
|
|
|
Post by phillistine on Feb 11, 2015 16:17:45 GMT
The reality is that it may not get that far.
By imposing this date it is forcing Sainsburys to act rather than sitting back and just leaving Rovers hanging. Lets face it no-one denies that a contract exists and it is now down to Sainsburys to prove that Rovers have broken it. We cant gauge how strong a case they have because they haven't really needed to do anything until now.
This should be fairly clear cut however as everything is in black and white and either the contract is broken or it is not
|
|
|
|
Post by Severncider on Feb 11, 2015 17:27:44 GMT
The reality is that it may not get that far. By imposing this date it is forcing Sainsburys to act rather than sitting back and just leaving Rovers hanging. Lets face it no-one denies that a contract exists and it is now down to Sainsburys to prove that Rovers have broken it. We cant gauge how strong a case they have because they haven't really needed to do anything until now. This should be fairly clear cut however as everything is in black and white and either the contract is broken or it is not Or if broken, who's fault was that. |
|
|
|
Post by phillistine on Feb 11, 2015 17:45:09 GMT
The reality is that it may not get that far. By imposing this date it is forcing Sainsburys to act rather than sitting back and just leaving Rovers hanging. Lets face it no-one denies that a contract exists and it is now down to Sainsburys to prove that Rovers have broken it. We cant gauge how strong a case they have because they haven't really needed to do anything until now. This should be fairly clear cut however as everything is in black and white and either the contract is broken or it is not Or if broken, who's fault was that. Do I assume that if Rovers win the case you will also wish to sing the praises of the people who put the contract in place? |
|
|
|
Post by Russgas on Feb 11, 2015 17:51:02 GMT
I wonder if comments regarding the court case rovers v sainsburys should be suspended untill the outcome is known. I have seen this done on press releases etc. I am just a bit worried that if we get abusive or derogatory stuff on here it may harm our cause. Feel free anybody to tell me I am being paranoid. I don't think the ramblings on this forum wil have any bearing on the outcome of the court hearing. No one posting on here has any knowledge of the contractural situation between the parties and I doubt very much that anyone amongst the select few would be writing comments on here. All this forum provides is an opportunity for frustrated fans to discuss the situation as they see it, and there's nothing wrong with that I can't really see a situation where, in summing up, the Learned Judge says "I was minded to make a full award in favour of the Stadium Company with additional punitive damages against J. Sainsbury until I chanced to read through several threads on something called GAs Chat forum. Having digested some of the scurrilous, inaccurate and downright rude comments contained therein I find myself compelled to find in favour of said Sainsburys. in summary, I would say to the contributors on that forum........ "You're sh!t, and you know you are, You're sh!t, and you know you are".............. Brilliant. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 11, 2015 19:41:54 GMT
Loose lips sink ships.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mark Ash on Feb 11, 2015 20:54:17 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 11, 2015 21:01:09 GMT
“Speak only if it improves upon the silence.” - Gandhi
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 11, 2015 21:04:27 GMT
|
|
