|
|
Post by yattongas on Mar 11, 2021 8:08:03 GMT
No , I believe Meghan & Prince Harry over an unnamed aide . You obvs believe the unnamed aide over a prince . Ok 👍 As for the money side of things , they’re free to strike whatever deals they like now. As a free marketeer voting Tory you should be applauding them surely? That is an aide to the King in awaiting, so very much doubt he would be lying. I have absolutely no issue with Harry and Meghan signing deals worth over $100M (I must say I'm surprised you don't) but what gets me is for them to sit there saying the past year has been incredibly tough, (hasn't it been tough for everyone in the UK, with 120k+ families mourning a loved one) and say he is disappointed with his father because he has been cut off financially at age 36 and he won't get his security paid for by in effect the UK tax payer when he could afford his own security . Quite the take not believing a prince but saying a unnamed aide should be believed ahead of him 🤔 |
|
|
|
Post by trevorgas on Mar 11, 2021 8:15:35 GMT
That is an aide to the King in awaiting, so very much doubt he would be lying. I have absolutely no issue with Harry and Meghan signing deals worth over $100M (I must say I'm surprised you don't) but what gets me is for them to sit there saying the past year has been incredibly tough, (hasn't it been tough for everyone in the UK, with 120k+ families mourning a loved one) and say he is disappointed with his father because he has been cut off financially at age 36 and he won't get his security paid for by in effect the UK tax payer when he could afford his own security . Quite the take not believing a prince but saying a unnamed aide should be believed ahead of him 🤔 A title doesn't make you honest look at Andrew 😆 |
|
|
|
Post by francegas on Mar 11, 2021 8:23:22 GMT
That is an aide to the King in awaiting, so very much doubt he would be lying. I have absolutely no issue with Harry and Meghan signing deals worth over $100M (I must say I'm surprised you don't) but what gets me is for them to sit there saying the past year has been incredibly tough, (hasn't it been tough for everyone in the UK, with 120k+ families mourning a loved one) and say he is disappointed with his father because he has been cut off financially at age 36 and he won't get his security paid for by in effect the UK tax payer when he could afford his own security . Quite the take not believing a prince but saying a unnamed aide should be believed ahead of him 🤔 Maybe what the aide said came from Charles himself. So I'd believe what the future King says over a Prince that will never be king. As you fail to answer the financial part I will ask you directly.. 1. At age 36 should Harry continue to be funded by his father? 2. Even if he has been cut off financially do you believe he has enough money to fund his own security. 3. If you answer yes to question 2 do you therefore think it should be Harry paying for his security. 3 pretty simple questions! |
|
|
|
Post by yattongas on Mar 11, 2021 8:40:09 GMT
Quite the take not believing a prince but saying a unnamed aide should be believed ahead of him 🤔 A title doesn't make you honest look at Andrew 😆 Being an aide doesn’t either ! |
|
|
|
Post by yattongas on Mar 11, 2021 8:43:26 GMT
Quite the take not believing a prince but saying a unnamed aide should be believed ahead of him 🤔 Maybe what the aide said came from Charles himself. So I'd believe what the future King says over a Prince that will never be king. As you fail to answer the financial part I will ask you directly.. 1. At age 36 should Harry continue to be funded by his father? 2. Even if he has been cut off financially do you believe he has enough money to fund his own security. 3. If you answer yes to question 2 do you therefore think it should be Harry paying for his security. 3 pretty simple questions! I’m not here to defend them ! Like I’ve said I don’t really care either way. I just find it amusing that you Brexity types without knowing either of them personally can come to the assumption that they are lying and they’ve made up the racism claim . Predictable yeah , with merit.... nah . |
|
|
|
Post by trevorgas on Mar 11, 2021 9:04:49 GMT
A title doesn't make you honest look at Andrew 😆 Being an aide doesn’t either ! So taking your view to a logical conclusion ,the Royal Family never comment on private matters they make their views known through aides/staff,we should take everything they say as untrue although that has been the protocol decades. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 11, 2021 9:06:22 GMT
Maybe what the aide said came from Charles himself. So I'd believe what the future King says over a Prince that will never be king. As you fail to answer the financial part I will ask you directly.. 1. At age 36 should Harry continue to be funded by his father? 2. Even if he has been cut off financially do you believe he has enough money to fund his own security. 3. If you answer yes to question 2 do you therefore think it should be Harry paying for his security. 3 pretty simple questions! I’m not here to defend them ! Like I’ve said I don’t really care either way. I just find it amusing that you Brexity types without knowing either of them personally can come to the assumption that they are lying and they’ve made up the racism claim . Predictable yeah , with merit.... nah . Kings and queens never ever lie. You know this yatton. |
|
|
|
Post by yattongas on Mar 11, 2021 9:17:30 GMT
Being an aide doesn’t either ! So taking your view to a logical conclusion ,the Royal Family never comment on private matters they make their views known through aides/staff,we should take everything they say as untrue although that has been the protocol decades. Not at all that’s not what I’m saying and you know it. People on here have said they think Meghan & Harry are lying but will believe an aide who they haven’t got a clue who they are ! At the risk of repeating myself ad nauseam . |
|
|
|
Post by yattongas on Mar 11, 2021 9:21:04 GMT
A title doesn't make you honest look at Andrew 😆 Being an aide doesn’t either ! And bringing this to its logical conclusion Trevorgas stylee....... The Royal family are not to be trusted so they must be lying |
|
|
|
Post by blueridge on Mar 11, 2021 9:42:48 GMT
Does anyone else find it slightly odd that the prolific poster who started this thread hasn’t posted since? Or has he?
|
|
|
|
Post by stuart1974 on Mar 11, 2021 9:47:23 GMT
Does anyone else find it slightly odd that the prolific poster who started this thread hasn’t posted since? Or has he? "Light the blue touch paper and stand well back." 😉 |
|
|
|
Post by yattongas on Mar 11, 2021 9:58:30 GMT
Does anyone else find it slightly odd that the prolific poster who started this thread hasn’t posted since? Or has he? GGMI is my alter ego 🤫 |
|
|
|
Post by trevorgas on Mar 11, 2021 10:01:57 GMT
Being an aide doesn’t either ! And bringing this to its logical conclusion Trevorgas stylee....... The Royal family are not to be trusted so they must be lying Dont disagree that some of them can't be trusted😆😆 |
|
|
|
Post by stuart1974 on Mar 11, 2021 10:07:56 GMT
Does anyone else find it slightly odd that the prolific poster who started this thread hasn’t posted since? Or has he? GGMI is my alter ego 🤫 That explains a lot. 😉 |
|
|
|
Post by trevorgas on Mar 11, 2021 10:11:21 GMT
Maybe what the aide said came from Charles himself. So I'd believe what the future King says over a Prince that will never be king. As you fail to answer the financial part I will ask you directly.. 1. At age 36 should Harry continue to be funded by his father? 2. Even if he has been cut off financially do you believe he has enough money to fund his own security. 3. If you answer yes to question 2 do you therefore think it should be Harry paying for his security. 3 pretty simple questions! I’m not here to defend them ! Like I’ve said I don’t really care either way. I just find it amusing that you Brexity types without knowing either of them personally can come to the assumption that they are lying and they’ve made up the racism claim . Predictable yeah , with merit.... nah . Let's not conflate two issue,I go back to my post last night. Why now Why not deal with it privately,the family matters that is. Who's got the most to gain What's the objective What's the motivation. Why drip feed the interview to make it more salacious. If you want to achieve reconciliation is that the way to do it in the public arena. If that's what they want to do then no problem but let's see it for what it is ,designed to cause maximum embarrassment and paint the Royals into a corner. |
|
|
|
Post by yattongas on Mar 11, 2021 10:26:57 GMT
Why not now ?
Perhaps they tried ?
Who knows ?
Feeling of injustice?
Ditto
Probably not.
*if their claims are true and the racism did happen , too bloody right it should be exposed and it should cause damage . Don’t you agree or do you think it should be swept under the carpet and ignored. A bit like Andrew ?
|
|
|
|
Post by trevorgas on Mar 11, 2021 10:35:45 GMT
Why not now ? Perhaps they tried ? Who knows ? Feeling of injustice? Ditto Probably not. *if their claims are true and the racism did happen , too bloody right it should be exposed and it should cause damage . Don’t you agree or do you think it should be swept under the carpet and ignored. A bit like Andrew ? No I don't however,we are talking about 1 individual,why wasn't addressed by Harry at the time? Why not name the individual not create a guessing game,get it out there it does us all a massive disservice to only tell half the story. |
|
|
|
Post by yattongas on Mar 11, 2021 11:05:17 GMT
Why not now ? Perhaps they tried ? Who knows ? Feeling of injustice? Ditto Probably not. *if their claims are true and the racism did happen , too bloody right it should be exposed and it should cause damage . Don’t you agree or do you think it should be swept under the carpet and ignored. A bit like Andrew ? No I don't however,we are talking about 1 individual,why wasn't addressed by Harry at the time? Why not name the individual not create a guessing game,get it out there it does us all a massive disservice to only tell half the story. Yeah I agree who ever it was should of been named rather than leaving many in the frame. It’s an odd sort of loyalty accusing but not naming anyone. |
|
|
|
Post by trevorgas on Mar 11, 2021 11:20:45 GMT
No I don't however,we are talking about 1 individual,why wasn't addressed by Harry at the time? Why not name the individual not create a guessing game,get it out there it does us all a massive disservice to only tell half the story. Yeah I agree who ever it was should of been named rather than leaving many in the frame. It’s an odd sort of loyalty accusing but not naming anyone. Yep get it out there we should know,not sure it's loyalty just adds to the drama don't you think. |
|
|
|
Post by francegas on Mar 11, 2021 11:50:50 GMT
Maybe what the aide said came from Charles himself. So I'd believe what the future King says over a Prince that will never be king. As you fail to answer the financial part I will ask you directly.. 1. At age 36 should Harry continue to be funded by his father? 2. Even if he has been cut off financially do you believe he has enough money to fund his own security. 3. If you answer yes to question 2 do you therefore think it should be Harry paying for his security. 3 pretty simple questions! I’m not here to defend them ! Like I’ve said I don’t really care either way. I just find it amusing that you Brexity types without knowing either of them personally can come to the assumption that they are lying and they’ve made up the racism claim . Predictable yeah , with merit.... nah . Sorry but I don't see where Brexit comes into this. In fact I have never stated what I voted or if I even voted. What is a Brexity type? I take it your assuming anyone who voted Brexit must be a racist. I haven't stated they are lying about the racist claim I just don't understand why Harry didn't sort it at the time and put the matter to bed without the need to spout it out to the world. When you say because we don't know them personally we have come to the conclusion they must be lying I take it then you do know them personally and they must be good friends of yours because you have made the assumption or know every word they said was the truth ! |
|
