yattongas
Forum Legend
Posts: 15,503 
Member is Online
|
Post by yattongas on Feb 16, 2022 6:50:47 GMT
£12 million 😮
|
|
|
|
Post by Hugo the Elder on Feb 16, 2022 7:39:45 GMT
I've never met him either. And I almost certainly didn't meet him when he was having a burger somewhere. Do I get 12M too? |
|
|
|
Post by Gas Go Marching In on Feb 16, 2022 10:16:48 GMT
Didn't she say that she wasn't concerned about the money but wanted her day in court? What Andrew's done is effectively sign a confession as far as the court of public opinion goes. Sightings of him from now on will be as likely as those of Nessie. Oh I'm sure she did. If you're in her position would you rather take Andrew going to jail, a pat on the back and endless interviews or a cool few million to set yourself up for life before going after the next offender? Let's hope we never have to see him again She's a woman of no principles, I could call her a lot worse but I will leave it at that. Both of them disgust me. 🤢 Nobody looks good out of it. |
|
|
|
Post by dudelebowski on Feb 16, 2022 10:38:47 GMT
Oh I'm sure she did. If you're in her position would you rather take Andrew going to jail, a pat on the back and endless interviews or a cool few million to set yourself up for life before going after the next offender? Let's hope we never have to see him again She's a woman of no principles, I could call her a lot worse but I will leave it at that. Both of them disgust me. 🤢 Nobody looks good out of it. Strange way of saying I love the Royals & Andrew seems like a top bloke. |
|
|
|
Post by Gas Go Marching In on Feb 16, 2022 10:41:20 GMT
She's a woman of no principles, I could call her a lot worse but I will leave it at that. Both of them disgust me. 🤢 Nobody looks good out of it. Strange way of saying I love the Royals & Andrew seems like a top bloke. Not at all. They both look bad out of it. She was clearly only worried about one thing, money. |
|
|
|
Post by peterparker on Feb 16, 2022 10:42:58 GMT
honestly think it is time to discuss the monarchy after The Queen dies
|
|
|
|
Post by Hugo the Elder on Feb 16, 2022 21:52:56 GMT
Oh I'm sure she did. If you're in her position would you rather take Andrew going to jail, a pat on the back and endless interviews or a cool few million to set yourself up for life before going after the next offender? Let's hope we never have to see him again She's a woman of no principles, I could call her a lot worse but I will leave it at that. Both of them disgust me. 🤢 Nobody looks good out of it. So the Queens second son was great mates with 2 pedo, sex traffickers, has obviously lied his tits off and used tax payers money to make it go away so Mummy can have a party and your take away from it is that one of the victims has made money for herself and for her charity? .....okay. |
|
yattongas
Forum Legend
Posts: 15,503
Member is Online
|
Post by yattongas on Feb 16, 2022 22:55:01 GMT
Strange way of saying I love the Royals & Andrew seems like a top bloke. Not at all. They both look bad out of it. She was clearly only worried about one thing, money. Victim blaming 🙄 |
|
|
|
Post by Gas Go Marching In on Feb 17, 2022 5:28:29 GMT
She's a woman of no principles, I could call her a lot worse but I will leave it at that. Both of them disgust me. 🤢 Nobody looks good out of it. So the Queens second son was great mates with 2 pedo, sex traffickers, has obviously lied his tits off and used tax payers money to make it go away so Mummy can have a party and your take away from it is that one of the victims has made money for herself and for her charity? .....okay. She's not a victim, the moment she accepted being paid off was the moment she stopped being a victim. |
|
|
|
Post by Hugo the Elder on Feb 17, 2022 6:32:01 GMT
So the Queens second son was great mates with 2 pedo, sex traffickers, has obviously lied his tits off and used tax payers money to make it go away so Mummy can have a party and your take away from it is that one of the victims has made money for herself and for her charity? .....okay. She's not a victim, the moment she accepted being paid off was the moment she stopped being a victim. You are so wrong. You don't stop being a victim the moment you receive any form of justice or compensation. That's an utterly ridiculous position to defend. If I sexually assaulted your child, then offered them enough money to be set for life 20 years later you'd think that a good deal? Jesus wept mate, I know you like a bit of banter and being contrary at times, but you really could do with a little reflection on this. |
|
|
|
Post by Gas Go Marching In on Feb 17, 2022 6:33:46 GMT
She's not a victim, the moment she accepted being paid off was the moment she stopped being a victim. You are so wrong. You don't stop being a victim the moment you receive any form of justice or compensation. That's an utterly ridiculous position to defend. If I sexually assaulted your child, then offered them enough money to be set for life 20 years later you'd think that a good deal? Jesus wept mate, I know you like a bit of banter and being contrary at times, but you really could do with a little reflection on this. No but I wouldn't accept it out of principle. She's accepted it so her principles have gone out of the window, she can't have her cake and eat it. It's been proven in my eyes that it was all about money for her. And it also proves that Prince Andrew had something to hide. I'm not wrong Hugo, I just have a difference of opinion to your true leftie self. The real victims are the likes of the UK taxpayer that are now paying for it. |
|
|
|
Post by Hugo the Elder on Feb 17, 2022 6:50:40 GMT
You are so wrong. You don't stop being a victim the moment you receive any form of justice or compensation. That's an utterly ridiculous position to defend. If I sexually assaulted your child, then offered them enough money to be set for life 20 years later you'd think that a good deal? Jesus wept mate, I know you like a bit of banter and being contrary at times, but you really could do with a little reflection on this. No but I wouldn't accept it out of principle. She's accepted it so her principles have gone out of the window, she can't have her cake and eat it. It's been proven in my eyes that it was all about money for her. And it also proves that Prince Andrew had something to hide. I'm not wrong Hugo, I just have a difference of opinion to your true leftie self. The real victims are the likes of the UK taxpayer that are now paying for it. So you think she wasn't a victim because of the type of justice she received? Accepting compensation does not mean you are not a victim. Prison is the only means of justice? With this settlement, it guarantees everyone will think Andrew is guilty. There is no risk of dodgy trial or him being found not guilty on some loophole or technicality. Seems like a sensible decision on her part. I wouldn't trust the legal system in this instance either. |
|
|
|
Post by peterparker on Feb 17, 2022 9:24:16 GMT
You are so wrong. You don't stop being a victim the moment you receive any form of justice or compensation. That's an utterly ridiculous position to defend. If I sexually assaulted your child, then offered them enough money to be set for life 20 years later you'd think that a good deal? Jesus wept mate, I know you like a bit of banter and being contrary at times, but you really could do with a little reflection on this. No but I wouldn't accept it out of principle. She's accepted it so her principles have gone out of the window, she can't have her cake and eat it. It's been proven in my eyes that it was all about money for her. And it also proves that Prince Andrew had something to hide. I'm not wrong Hugo, I just have a difference of opinion to your true leftie self. The real victims are the likes of the UK taxpayer that are now paying for it. It was only a Civil case anyway, so unless Maxwell starts singing, the only outcomes were damages to be paid to or not. We all saw Andy's performance on BBC when interviewed which pretty much tells us all we need to know of the compensation, we don't know how much is going to the charity and how much support and assistance that might give other victims |
|
|
|
Post by Gassy on Feb 17, 2022 9:53:37 GMT
Good to see there are still modern day heroes out there who work for free or whenever they claim insurance/damages, they just let the other side keep it
|
|
|
|
Post by baggins on Feb 17, 2022 12:53:25 GMT
You are so wrong. You don't stop being a victim the moment you receive any form of justice or compensation. That's an utterly ridiculous position to defend. If I sexually assaulted your child, then offered them enough money to be set for life 20 years later you'd think that a good deal? Jesus wept mate, I know you like a bit of banter and being contrary at times, but you really could do with a little reflection on this. No but I wouldn't accept it out of principle. She's accepted it so her principles have gone out of the window, she can't have her cake and eat it. It's been proven in my eyes that it was all about money for her. And it also proves that Prince Andrew had something to hide. I'm not wrong Hugo, I just have a difference of opinion to your true leftie self. The real victims are the likes of the UK taxpayer that are now paying for it. So anyone who gets financial payment for trauma has no principles? |
|
|
|
Post by Gas Go Marching In on Feb 17, 2022 15:46:55 GMT
Good to see there are still modern day heroes out there who work for free or whenever they claim insurance/damages, they just let the other side keep it She got what she wanted. A huge pay day. Both of them make me sick tbh. |
|
|
|
Post by dudelebowski on Feb 17, 2022 15:51:55 GMT
Good to see there are still modern day heroes out there who work for free or whenever they claim insurance/damages, they just let the other side keep it She got what she wanted. A huge pay day. Both of them make me sick tbh. Off the back of what she was subjected too, as a child? Have a word with yourself man. |
|
|
|
Post by Gas Go Marching In on Feb 17, 2022 16:24:20 GMT
She got what she wanted. A huge pay day. Both of them make me sick tbh. Off the back of what she was subjected too, as a child? Have a word with yourself man. What was she subjected to? She looks pretty happy to me in that photo. |
|
|
|
Post by stuart1974 on Feb 17, 2022 16:29:46 GMT
Off the back of what she was subjected too, as a child? Have a word with yourself man. What was she subjected to? She looks pretty happy to me in that photo. Are you sure you aren't just on the wind up? |
|
|
|
Post by Gas Go Marching In on Feb 17, 2022 16:33:23 GMT
What was she subjected to? She looks pretty happy to me in that photo. Are you sure you aren't just on the wind up? No. She has accepted a pay off so Andrew hasn't actually been found guilty of anything and if he really is that bad then maybe he will attack again but at least she's got her money so she's sorted. 👍💰 |
|
